|
In boardrooms, truth is rarely rejected outright. It is often edited. Not dramatically, but subtly. A risk is softened, a performance issue is reframed. A failure is delayed for “further review.” The intention is usually to maintain confidence, avoid alarm, or protect reputation. But over time, these small adjustments accumulate.
And that is where the real danger begins. Because just like the man who adjusted his CV, the problem is not what the organization has gone through. Every institution has its struggles, missed targets, failed initiatives, and operational gaps. These are not disqualifiers. In fact, when properly understood, they are sources of learning and improvement.
Boards depend on accurate information to make sound decisions. When that information is filtered, even slightly, the entire governance process is compromised. Decisions are made on partial truths. Risks are underestimated. Opportunities are misread. READ MORE |